New Study Suggests AI Coding Tools Could Be Slowing Developers Down Rather Than Speeding Up Projects.

Published: 12 Jul 2025
Despite promises of increased productivity, a fresh study contemplates whether today's advanced AI coding tools are actually slowing experienced developers down.

As we usher in the era of machine learning and AI-powered systems, the landscape of software development is undergoing a profound transformation. AI coding tools like Cursor and GitHub Copilot, powered by models from tech giants like OpenAI and Google DeepMind, have entered the game, proclaiming grand promises to automate code writing, mend bugs and test changes. The vision is to revamp the workflows of software engineers and skyrocket their productivity. But does reality mirror the hype? A recent study by the non-profit AI research group METR prompts us to question this very premise.

The participating developers, heralding from diverse backgrounds, had an intriguing prediction. They expected AI coding tools to slash their completion time by a hefty 24%. Much to everyone’s surprise, the outcome was antithetical to the prediction. The study found the utilization of AI to increase completion time by 19%. In other words, developers were clocking more time with AI tools!

Interestingly, only a little over half of the participating developers were experienced in using Cursor, the primary AI tool offered during this study. While 94% of participants had some experience with web-based LLMs in their coding workflows, this study served as a first encounter with Cursor for some. Developers were thoroughly trained on using Cursor before the commencement of the study.

The results of this ground-breaking study challenge the widespread belief in the universal productivity benefits of AI coding tools, specifically deemed as ‘vibe coders’. However, the researchers are cautious to not draw any premature conclusions. Other larger-scale studies have shown that AI coding tools do indeed accelerate software engineering processes. Progress in the AI arena has been explosive, to put it modestly, and even the findings of a study conducted a few months ago may not hold true today.

Despite the unexpected results of the METR study, the researchers express optimism about AI’s role in the future of coding. AI tools are showing steadfast improvement in their capability to undertake complex, long-term tasks. Even as these results call for some healthy skepticism against the oft-promised gains of AI tools, they also underscore an evolving narrative about the future of software development and the role AI tools will play in shaping this landscape.